Monday, August 30, 2010

Reaction to "First the Forest"

“First the Forest” talks about the ways that humans were/used to be connected with the forest and how now we view the forest as a dangerous place, harboring things of evil. Robert Harrison says that human beings were free underneath the canopy of the forests, then the lightning came and we were then aware of the sky, he says that this sparks our imagination. This could mean that we are all fine with what is around us and then the minute that something new is introduced we create an explanation that works for our world, this means that our imaginations are used a lot. However in this text also the author seems to say that the forest was the only place that the humans felt that they could be wild and free to do what they pleased and not be minded by the consequences and the implications. He then proceeds to describe freedom and it actually seems pretty horrible because of how crude and primitive life seems. Then Harrison goes on to talk about how the humans felt the need to move “away” from the forests, but they continued to affiliate themselves with the forest through family trees and being born from the trees because their ancestors were buried there. Then the need to clear a piece of their forest to calm the chaos and to raise a family sanely is discussed, this would mean a life without freedom.

2 comments:

  1. Samantha, although you summarize the article, I'm more interested in hearing about why you feel his notion of primal freedom is "horrible". What connections can you make to We?

    ReplyDelete
  2. As a response to the comment posted earlier, I believe that as a result of our lack of freedom (because we no longer live in the forest) we think that truly letting go and being absolutely free is horrible because it seems to be animal and primitive. We see ourselves and the rest of society as living as superior beings compared to animals and if we were to resort back to the things mentioned as true freedom in the text we would then consider ourselves to have become animals again. Therefore we are trapped be our own notion of complete freedom being an archaic way of life. This is portrayed in the novel “We,” in this novel we see that the main character D-503 speaks condescendingly about how life was for the ancients, describing how life is for us, telling us that they old ways were disgusting and wild. From this we see that in comparison with the way life is lived in the One State we have a great deal more freedom and it is seen as bad, just like the comparison in the text between when we lived in the forests and now.

    ReplyDelete